Politeness Strategy Between Presidential Candidates in the First Debate Indonesian Presidential Candidate in 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v15i1.763Keywords:
politeness strategy debate presidential candidate pragmaticsAbstract
This research discusses three main things, namely the polite language forms of presidential candidates in the first debate, the types of politeness strategies of presidential candidates in debates, and the social phenomenon of the forms and types of politeness used by presidential candidates. The data source is an official video from the general election commission (KPU) entitled First Debate of Presidential Candidates for the 2024 Election on YouTube which is located at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNO0YS846kU. The data is in the form of utterances containing polite acts from the three presidential candidates. This research uses a qualitative study framework with a pragmatic approach, especially politeness theory. The method used is listening, free speech. To make analysis easier, this method is supported by note-taking techniques. Data analysis was carried out through four stages, namely data collection, data reduction, data presentation followed by the conclusion of the research results. The research results show that 1) the form of politeness that dominates the debate is positive politeness. Negative politeness and false politeness have equal dominance. Overt politeness did not appear in the debate; 2) the strategy that often appears is the strategy of greeting with a system of familiarity, promises and thanks; 3) The social phenomenon that emerged from these two meetings was that the contestants paid their respects by acknowledging the existence of the presidential candidates. This recognition is reduced to a greeting strategy to show closeness, deliver political promises, and convey words of thanks to other parties.References
Aida Azizah. (2019). Analisis wacana “debat capres-cawapres 2019” dan implikasinya dalam mata kuliah pragmatik. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, Dan Pengajarannya, 2(2), 222–230. http://sasando.upstegal.ac.id
Aisyah, S. N. (2019). Modalitas bahasa indonesia dalam talk show mata najwa. Belajar Bahasa, 4(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.32528/bb.v4i2.2561
Bowen, C. (2011). Information for Families: Semantic and Pragmatic Difficulties. Http://Www.Speech-Language-Therapy.Com/. https://speech-language-therapy.com/
Brilian, M. (2021). Disfemisme dan eufemisme debat final trump vs biden di youtube. Prosiding seminar nasional linguistik dan sastra (SEMNALISA) 2021 , 131–138.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 8). Cambridge University Press.
Dell Hymes. (1972). Language in Society (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Dwi Septiani. (2021). Kata serapan dan istilah asing joko widodo dalam debat calon presiden dan wakil presiden 2019. Basastra, 10(1), 55–69.
Faradi, A. A. (2015). Kajian modalitas linguistik fungsional sistemik pada teks debat capres-cawapres pada pilpres 2014-2019 dan relevansinya dengan pembelajaran wacana di sekolah. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 1(2), 233–249. http://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/jret
Geoffrey Leech. (1989). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman Linguistics Library.
Jusniati, Sulihin Azis, Marselina, & Azis, S. (2022). Analisis kesantunanberbahasa dalam debat capres jokowi-prabowoperiode 2019-2024. Peqguruang: Conference Series, 4(2), 2686–3472. https://doi.org/10.35329/jp.v4i1.1504
Kesuma, T. M. J. (2007). Pengantar (Metode) Penelitian Bahasa. Carasvatibooks.
Ludvianto, M., & Arifani, W. (2020). Retorika persuasif dalam debat calon presiden indonesia 2019: sebuah analisis komunikasi performatif. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi (J-IKA, 7(1). http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/jika
Mahsun. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. www.rajagrafindo.co.id
Mayirga, B. (2023). Analisis tindak tutur representatif dalam wacana ham, korupsi, terorisme debat calon presiden 2019. Cakrawala, 6(2), 1228–1237.
Merdina Ziraluo. (2020). Analisis tindak tutur lokusi, ilikusi, dan perlokusi pada debat capres-cawapres republik indonesia tahun 2019. Education and Development, 8(2), 249–256.
Nadar, F. (2009). Pragmatik & Penelitian Pragmatik. Graha Ilmu.
Nur Salamah, & Sumarlam. (2019). Analisis Wacana Debat Pertama Capres dan Cawapres Pemilu 2019. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistik Dan Sastra (SEMANTIKS) 2019, 445–460.
Paramudhita Achmad, D., & Musdolifah, A. (2020). Strategi kesantunan berbahasa dalam acara debat calon presiden dan wakil presiden tahun 2019. In Kompetensi (Vol. 13, Issue 2).
Prasetyo, A., & Prayitno, H. J. (2020). Analisis Tindak Tutur Dalam Debat Capres Sebagai Strategi Menuju Presiden Indonesia 2019. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/87372%0Ahttps://eprints.ums.ac.id/87372/11/Naskah publikasi %2830%29.pdf
Ratna Juwita, S. (2014). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif dan Komisif dalam Debat Calon Presiden Republik Indonesia 2014: Studi Analisis Wacana. Eduscience, 3(1), 37–48.
Santoso, A., Utami Setyoningsih, R., Noor Assyifa, S., & Ulya, C. (2023). analisis kesalahan berbahasa dalam bidang fonologi pada unggahan akun youtube sekretariatan presiden. Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 13(2), 64–77. http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/JBSP/index
Siti Farmida, Ediwarman, E., & Tisnasari, S. (2021). analisis satire dan sarkasme dalam debat capres 2019 dan implementasinya terhadap pembelajaran di sma. Bahtera Indonesia; Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.31943/bi.v6i2.131
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (PengantarPenelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis). Duta Wacana University Press.
Tuty Ayudatussholiha. (2020). Tindak ilokusi dalam debat capres ri pemilu 2019 dan korelasinya dengan prinsip kesantunan. Mabahits, 1(1), 79–91.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Wirduna, & Uun Wawadika. (2022). Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerjasama dalam Debat Capres dan Cawapres Republik Indonesia 2019. Master Bahasa, 10(3), 45–53. http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/MB
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Arianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author who published an article in the Madah journal has agreed on the following points.
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under Creative Commons Atribution Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows other to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed to publish articles that have been published by the Journal of Madah through separate contractual agreements for non-exclusive dissemination (e.g, placing them into an institutional repository or publishing them in a book) by keeping the first issue in the Madah journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate their work in cyberspace (e.g, in institutional repositories or author pages) before and during the submission of the text document as it can support productive exchange of earlier and broader credits.
