Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA Bilingual

Authors

  • Rosinawati Dewi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Sarwiji Suwandi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Edy Tri Sulistyo Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v10i1.182

Keywords:

adherence to the principle of, politeness, the scale of politeness, learning

Abstract

Politeness are two important things that cannot be separated in learning activities. The purpose of this research is to explain the adherence to the principles of politeness in learning Indonesian dan the scale of politeness used in Indonesian language learning. The subject of this research is the students of grade 2 Al Abidin Bilingual Boarding Senior High School, Surakarta. Research methodology is descriptive qualitative which aims to generate data based on existing phenomenon empirically and the result is what it is. Research data is speech in learning Indonesian at Al Abidin Bilingual Boarding Senior High School Surakarta. Data collection methods that used in this research were uninvolved conversation observation, note taking, and recording technique. Validity of data in this research used triangulation technique of data source and triangulation method. The results of this research indicate that the dominant principle of politeness in Indonesian language learning in SMA Al Abidin Bilingual Boarding School Surakarta is (1) maxim of wisdom, (2) social distance scale used by students with other students, (3) social status scale used by students with teacher, (4) relative position scale of speech in learning occurs in official situations using Indonesian when interact between students and teachers.

References

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cahyaningrum, F., Andayani, A., & Setiawan, B. (2018). Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa dalam Berdiskusi. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 9(1), 45—54. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31503/madah.v9i1.682

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Fhitri, W. (2017). Kesantunan Permintaan :Interaksi Mahasiswa dan Dosen. Jurnal Gramatika, 1(1), 9—26. https://doi.org/10.22202/JG.2017.V3i1.1793

Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 219—236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N

Gunawan, F. (2013). Wujud Kesantunan Berbahasa Mahasiswa terhadap Dosen di STAIN Kendari, 1(1), 8—18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.1.1.818.2013

Halid, E. (2017). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Kegiatan Diskusi Mahasiswa Angkatan 2016 Program Studi DIII. Bahastra, 37(1), 1—8. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/bahastra.v37i1.5957

Hasibuan, N. H. (2005). Perangkat Tindak Tutur dan Siasat Kesantunan Berbahasa (Data Bahasa Mandailing). Logat: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra, I(2), 87—95.

Hymes, D. (1972). Models of Interaction of Language and Social Life. In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (John J. Gu, p. 58—65). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.

Jumadi. (2010). Wacana. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Prisma. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Mahsun. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Monsefi, M., & Hadidi, Y. (2015). Male and Female EFL Teachers’ Politeness Strategies in Oral Discourse and their Effects on the Learning Process and Teacher-Student Interaction. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 3(2), 1—13. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.681.6386&rep=rep1 &type=pdf

Pranowo. (2012). Berbahasa Secara Santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Price, H., & Wilson, J. (2018). Applying Politeness Research: An Introduction to the Soto Data. Journal of Politeness Research, 14(1), 1—17. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0057

Rahardi, K. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Salifu, N. A. (2010). Signaling Politeness, Power and Solidarity through Terms of Address in Dagbanli. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 19(4), 274—292. Retrieved from http://www.njas.helsinki.fi/pdf-files/vol19num4/salifu.pdf

Setiawan, H., & Rois, S. (2017). Wujud Kesantunan Berbahasa Guru : Studi Kasus Di Sd Immersion Ponorogo. Jurnal Gramatika, 3(2), 145—161. https://doi.org/10.22202/JG.2017.V3i2.2003

Shing, S. R. (2012). Politeness in mentor-mentee talk. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 743—752. Retrieved from https://jhumansciences.com/ojs/index.php/ijhs/article/view/2332

Sulistyo, E. T. (2013). Pragmatik: Suatu Kajian Awal. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-25

How to Cite

Dewi, R., Suwandi, S., & Sulistyo, E. T. (2019). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA Bilingual. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v10i1.182