Penyimpangan Prinsip Kesopanan pada Wacana Delik Pencemaran Nama Baik Status Facebook: Kajian Sosiopragmatik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v12i1.314Keywords:
deviance, politeness, pollution, facebook, sociopragmaticsAbstract
Kasus pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial semakin mengerikan. Hal tersebut terbukti dengan banyaknya kasus pencemaran nama baik di media sosial yang telah diungkap pihak berwenang. Studi ini bertujuan menggali bentuk-bentuk penyimpangan maksim-maksim kesopanan pada status facebook yang bermuatan delik pencemaran nama baik. Metode studi ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Data dalam studi ini berupa ungkapan-ungkapan pada status facebook yang bermuatan delik pencemaran nama baik dan bermuatan menyimpang dari maksim-maksim kesopanan. Sumber data dalam studi ini adalah status facebook yang bermuatan delik pencemaran nama baik tahun 2016-2017. Pengumpulan data dalam studi ini menggunakan metode dokumentasi dan catat. Analisis data dalam studi ini menggunakan metode padan ekstralingual dan diperkuat dengan teknik analisis kesantunan Leech. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan penyimpangan maksim-maksim kesopanan meliputi: penyimpangan maksim pujian; penyimpangan maksim kesimpatian; dan peyimpangan maksim kesepakatan. Penyimpangan maksim-maksim tersebut menjadi faktor yang menyebabkan seseorang penutur mencemarkan nama baik orang lain. Warganet dalam bertutur di media sosial seperti status facebook hendaknya menggunakan bahasa yang santun supaya terhindar dari jerat hukum seperti pencemaran nama baik, ujaran kebencian, dan hoax.References
Al-Rousan, M. Y., Awal, N. M., & Salehuddin, K. (2016). Compliment responses among male and female Jordanian university students. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(1), 19–34.
Baran, M. (2019). Emotivity and Sociopragmatic Classification of Ethnolects. Verba Hispanica, 26(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.4312/vh.26.1.35-56
Bashosh, S., Nejad, M. A., Rastegar, M., & Marzban, A. (2013). The Relationship between Shyness, Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety, Willingness to Communicate, Gender, and EFL Proficiency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.11.2098-2106
Beeching, K., & Woodfield, H. (2015). Researching Sociopragmatic Variability: Perspectives from Variational, Interlanguage and Contrastive Pragmatics. Inggris: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373953
Bhise, D. M. (2015). Importance of Politeness Principle. International Journal of Multifaceted and Multilingual Studies, 1(Vii), 1–8.
Cisco, J. (2016). A Case Study of University Honors Students in Humanities Through a Disciplinary Literacy Lens. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2015.1063742
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. America: United States of America.
Dynel, M. (2016). Conceptualizing Conversational Humour as (im)politeness : The Case of Film Talk. Journal of Politeness Research 2016;, 12(1), 117–147. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0023
Haddad, Y. A. (2018). The Sociopragmatics of Attitude Datives in Levantine Arabic. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Jabbarifar, T. (2016). The Importance Of Human Communication Systems And The Teaching Of The English Language. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 10(3), 219. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v10i3.8741
Jahdiah. (2018). Kesantunan Tindak Tutur Bamamai dalam Bahasa Banjar: Berdasarkan Skala Kesantunan Leech. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 7(2), 164–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v7i2.530
Jauhari, E. (2018). Alat-alat Kesantunan Kritik dalam Masyarakat Jawa Surabaya: Kajian Pragmatik. Mozaik Humaniora, 18(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/mh.v18i2.10931
Karimi, K., & Biria, R. (2017). Exploring Emotive Verbs in Persian and English Short Stories: A Contrastive Sociopragmatic Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(2), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9443-1
Kusno, A. (2015). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesopanan pada Kasus Delik Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik. In Seminar Nasional PRASASTI II “Kajian Pragmatik dalam Berbagai Bidang” (pp. 88–93).
Lam, P. (2016). Pragmatic Issues in Specialized Communicative Contexts. Pragmatic Issues in Specialized Communicative Contexts, (Leech 1983). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004323902
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mahsun, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Mahsun, M. S. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi Metode dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Miil, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mujiyanto, Y. (2017). the Verbal Politeness of Interpersonal Utterances Resulted From Back-Translating Indonesian Texts Into English. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 288. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4914
Olaniyi, K. (2017). Politeness Principle and Ilorin Greetings in Nigeria: A Sociolinguistic Study. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 5(1), 58–67.
Olomouc, S. V. (2018). Politeness research : Key trajectories and their applicability in intercultural communication. Linguistik Online, 89(2), 83–104.
Osman, M. W. R., & Wahab, A. H. (2018). Kesantunan Berbahasa Kaunselor Pelatih dalam Sesi Kaunseling. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18(1), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1801-15
Rahardi, K. R. (2017). Pragmatic Phenomena Constellation in Specific Culture Dimension Language Study. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 84–92.
Shahrokhi, M., & Bidabadi, F. S. (2013). An Overview of Politeness Theories: Current Status, Future Orientations. American Journal of Linguistics, 2(2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.linguistics.20130202.02
Stukan, D. (2018). Sociopragmatic Failure: Struggling with Cross-Cultural Differences in Communication. Open Journal for Anthropological Studies, 2(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojas.0201.03027s
Sukarno. (2015). Politeness Strategies in Responding to Compliments in Javanese. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v4i2.686
Tojo, H., & Takagi, A. (2017). Trends in Qualitative Research in Three Major Language Teaching and Learning Journals, 2006–2015. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v4n1p37
Yang, J. (2016). The Fifth Northeast Asia International Symposium on Language , Literature and Translation.
Zurqoni, Z., Retnawati, H., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2019). Impact of Character Education Implementation: a Goal-Free Evaluation. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(6), 881–899. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.881
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author who published an article in the Madah journal has agreed on the following points.
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under Creative Commons Atribution Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows other to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed to publish articles that have been published by the Journal of Madah through separate contractual agreements for non-exclusive dissemination (e.g, placing them into an institutional repository or publishing them in a book) by keeping the first issue in the Madah journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate their work in cyberspace (e.g, in institutional repositories or author pages) before and during the submission of the text document as it can support productive exchange of earlier and broader credits.
